On our knowledge of things, we think that our acquaintance can't be wrong, but when trying to pursue true knowledge and, to have some wrong interferences is also possible. asAs Bertrand discussed the knowledge of truth, it is shown clearly that it is different from the knowledge of things, as it has an opposite to it that's problematic, that's called error. As dualism exists; we tend to believe that thingsthings falsely and truly. As people hold various beliefs through their lifetime, as these beliefs differ and are contradictory to each other, some of these beliefs must be erroneous. The question that needs immediate attention to in this chapter is how to differentiate a true belief from a false belief. Russell guarantees that no palatable answer is conceivable,; however, before moving toward conceivable replies at all, there must initially be an examination concerning the significance of the ideas of truth and misrepresentation. He focuses on that this part is simply worried about what is implied by the inquiry of, regardless of whether a conviction is valid or false, not withby distinguishing which convictions are valid or false. Not by identifying, which belief is true andor false. And in a result for his thinking this, he inducted three preconditioned features to make his point in the theory of truth:
First, the theory must have its opposite in which, if there would be truetruth, there must be a falsehood.