In oOutsider in the House, Sanders and Gutman discussed Sanders ups and downs through out his life as a progressive socialists and outspoken dissident, using his experience to brouinght controversies and injustice in American political system. His fight for a livable minimum wage to campaigning on behalf of fair electoral politics, he sheds light on his challenges with both the left and right.

Sanders had a long political carrieer and it is obvious to have a many challenges and improvements. He can be viewed as an experienced person in the field of politics. The professor of English at University of Vermont mentions, in his book, “Outsider in the hHouse”, that he was a longest serving socialist in the US House of Representatives.
His review about Bernie Sanders seems legitimate because many of sSanders speeches and the work that he had done are found online today.


Slavin, in his article, “Congress lLone sSocialist” mentions that he attended the high school together with Sanders in Brooklyn, New York. He basically talks about sSanders up to Brooklyn College, his hobbies, likes, dislikes, and the issues that he is concerned about. However, the writer continues and criticized Sanders, saying how could a guy who refuses to join a two major political party in the US would be able to united people and build crumble infrastructure in the nation.

Steve Slavin is a relaltor in Indiana, and he runs a real estate firm. All the points that he mentions in the article seems fact beside his criticism to Sanders. Because criticism clearly seems irrelevant and unnecessary, a guy who does not join a party does not mean how would not be able to run for the president. His criticism to Sanders lacks support, which is unnecessary and therefore is a bias view. He should have provided more concrete or specific details about why Sanders ins incapable for performing the president job so that his criticisms can be viewed as strong and supportive statements.